Clemson is trying to have its case versus the ACC heard in a nearby Pickens County court. But it's questionable whether venue really matters in a contract dispute. Travis Bell/Sideline Carolina
- Travis Bell/Sideline Carolina
Top Story
Jon Blau has covered Clemson athletics for The Post and Courier since 2021. A native of South Jersey, he grew up on Rocky marathons and hoagies. To get the latest Clemson sports news, straight to your inbox, subscribe to his newsletter, The Tiger Take.
Jon Blau
CLEMSON— Clemson and the Atlantic Coast Conference are arguing about broadcast rights to sporting events, so it seems fitting to say the opening round of their legal fight is all about "home court" advantage.
The ACC wants its case heard in North Carolina, which is where school presidents would have signed the conference's grant of rights agreement.
Clemson wants its case heard in South Carolina, where it filed a lawsuit in search of loopholes in the ACC-ESPN agreements that could lead to an early exit.
Each side's attorneys have volleyed back and forth in legal filings about sovereign immunity and personal jurisdiction.They are slated to verbally spar in Pickens (S.C.) and Mecklenburg (N.C.) counties in July to try and dismiss each other's cases. There is a legal "win" to be had, and they're vying for it.
Clemson
Clemson doubles up on Big Ten power hitters in transfer portal
- By Jon Blaujblau@postandcourier.com
But really, truly, how much of a difference could there be between a courtroom in one Carolina as opposed to the other?
"It matters a whole lot less than people think it does," said David McKenzie, an intellectual property lawyer in North Carolina with decades of experience. "You have a contract that’s in black and white and a judge in Pickens that can evaluate that and interpret that as well as a judge in Charlotte."
In the end, this chapter in the legal process might be much ado about nothing.
This isn't a murder case where a jury pool is better in one county or another, because there is no jury. This isn't a situation where the laws in South Carolina or North Carolina make it especially easy to wiggle out of a contract.
That it's taken three months for arguments over venue to reach a courtroom, with a hearing slated for July 2 in Charlotte, is just a demonstration of the mud crawl of litigation.
That each side wants the case closer to home — because it could feasibly, maybe, possibly create an advantage—is just standard procedure.
With tens and possibly hundreds of millions of dollars at stake, it's worth a try.
"You’re supposed to have an impartial judge, you’re supposed to have an impartial jury, and you’re supposed to have an impartial jurisprudence," said Irwin Kishner, a corporate attorney and affiliate member of the sports law committee of the New York City Bar Association.
"That said judges, the judicial system is made up of human beings, and human beings have proclivities and what I’ll call innate biases."
Reasons to argue
Clemson and the ACC can hope for name recognition in counties where they reside. Lawyers could benefit from familiarity with certain judges. They might like how precedents in state case law line up withtheir overall legal strategy.
Where to argue a case is just part of a "privileged analysis" lawyers provide clients, Greenville-based intellectual property attorney Wes Few said.
"Undoubtedly, both sides are going to have very sophisticated lawyers on a dispute of this magnitude. If they don’t, then God help them," Few said. "Each side wants it to be heard where they want it to be heard. They have their reasons. It could be a multitude of reasons. It might be a balancing of reasons.”
That said,Perry H. Gravely, who is handling the case in Pickens County, is considered a fair-minded, middle-of-the-road judge. He isn't exactly a Clemson partisan, either. Gravely holds degrees from Wofford and South Carolina.
The judge in Charlotte, Louis Bledsoe, graduated from UNC in Chapel Hill.
And it's likely Gravely and Bledsoe will be just the first pair of eyes on this case, because their rulings are likely to be appealed.
If they don't rule smartly, they risk embarrassment when their decisions are overruled by an appellate judge.
"It’s such a unicorn of a case, you can’t say one court or one judge is apt to go one way or another," Few said."Judges have reputations, and they’re usually well-earned. Just like lawyers have reputations that are well-earned."
In this case, Clemson has four firms working on its behalf: two in South Carolina, one in North Carolina, and another all the way from Boston.
Few previously worked at one of those firms, NelsonMullins, alongside a "superstar" attorney in David E. Dukes, a Clemson trustee who is also slated to represent the university in court. Nelson Mullins has an army of attorneys who can, Few said, research a case "to death" and "wear you out."
Clemson
Clemson fans not happy with EA Sports' ranking of Memorial Stadium. Here's why
- By Jon Blaujblau@postandcourier.com
That is the challenge the ACC faces, dealing with Florida State and Clemson in multiple jurisdictions. FSU recently scored a "win" as Leon County Circuit Judge John Cooperruled the school's case can proceed despite a parallel case in North Carolina, because the ACC does "significant business" in Florida.
Today's Top Headlines
Story continues below
-
A good neighbor's bad decision. Summerville man dies after placing firework atop his head.
-
Charleston's Sweet Grass Vodka abruptly closed. Actor Jeremy Renner and investors lost big.
-
Declining to pay, Charleston Probate Judge Irv Condon balks at debt, instead hires attorney
-
Lowes Foods sets opening date later this month for Aiken store
-
Want to live in a former WWII fort? See inside this Sullivan’s Island home selling for $5M.
-
Surfside Beach condo building closes after officials find 'structural deficiencies'
-
Checkpoint numbers from Goose Creek PD
-
Is ESPN's definition of 'game' a trade secret? Clemson objects to redactions in ACC suit.
-
Commentary: There is a better solution to the traffic bottleneck at Highways 17 and 41
-
1 killed in early-morning shooting in downtown Charleston
But will a legal war on multiple fronts convince the ACC to fold up its tent and price down its $140 million exit fee for FSU and Clemson? Not necessarily.
"I think it may appease a fan base or some donors," McKenzie said, "but for the seasoned lawyers that are involved in this case, I don’t think they are going to blink. The attorneys representing both sides are top-notch."
So Clemson will argue it filed first in Pickens County, and it can't be sued in another state because public institutions have "sovereign immunity." The ACC will counter that sovereign immunity went out the window when Clemson joined with schools from multiple states to leverage ESPN and spawn the ACC Network.
And Clemson filed first in this case, the ACC argues, only because of deceit.
ACC accusation
Just last week, the ACC entered an exhibit in Mecklenburg County documenting emails between attorneys for both parties dating back to Jan. 31.
They discussed language for a non-disclosure agreement, including a "standstill"— a promise that Clemson and the ACC would not sue each other while they discussed a resolution short of taking legal action.
FSU sued the ACC in late December. The standstill between the ACC and Clemson, as proposed in January, would have run until Aug. 1.
Thomas G. Hooper, formerly a Clemson-aligned attorney with Nelson Mullins, wrote back to Charlotte-based attorney James P. Cooney III on Feb. 8 saying the NDA should include something more "defined" than a date-based standstill.
"Rather than delay the discussion while we negotiated that section, we felt like we could circle back to that language via an amendment if it seemed like it might help the talks progress," Hooper wrote. "For now, we think that the attached draft NDA is sufficient to allow our respective clients to begin talking."
On Feb. 21, a week after the ACC's winter meetings, Cooney and Hooper completed another exchange about a proposed NDA, including points about confidentiality and the likelihood of the ACC and Clemson's discussions being verbal, not written, as to not be attainable by public records request.
Cooney followed up a week later on March 1. Hooper didn't reply.
Eighteen days later, Clemson sued the ACC.
"Clemson’s actions created a reasonable belief that no litigation would occur while discussions continued," the ACC's attorneys said in a June 20 filing, "and then, while the conference and Clemson were engaged in negotiating the terms of the documents necessary to facilitate those discussions, Clemson preemptively sued to achieve 'first-filed' status."
It's unclear how persuasive that argument will be with Bledsoe. Meanwhile, Clemson is pushing towardsummary judgment in South Carolina, arguing for a reading of the grant of rights and the ESPN deal whichhas the ACC holding onto the Tigers' broadcast rights for games played in the conference — but not games played in another league, if they were to leave.
The ACC wants that case dismissed. But if Gravely looks to Cooper's rulings in Florida for guidance, then Clemson's effort in South Carolina might live on.
Stranger yet, it's not out of the realm of possibility that both cases continue and Bledsoe and Gravely offer conflicting rulings, which could present a conundrum under the U.S. Constitution's "Full faith and credit" clause— which says states must respect the laws and judgments of courts from other states.
Even more surreal: The U.S. Supreme Court could end up breaking the tie.
Clemson
Not so fast, my friend: ACC objects to Clemson speeding up South Carolina court case
- By Jon Blaujblau@postandcourier.com
That is, of course, if Clemson, FSU, and the ACC don't just settle their cases before there is such a circ*mstance.
But it doesn't appear either side is quite ready for that.
"We’re going to fight it with every effort that we can,” ACC commissioner Jim Phillips said last week at an Associated Press Sports Editors meeting in Charlotte.
So the lawyers will argue.
The judges will rule.
Those in the profession will warn against believing there is a higher likelihood of a "win" in a plaintiff's backyard. Not that infrequently, lawyers represent out-of-state clients and they receive favorable rulings because the facts required it.
"Home-field advantage," McKenzie said, "is more of an athletic term than a legal one."
Follow Jon Blau on Twitter @Jon_Blau. Plus, receive the latest updates on Clemson athletics, straight to your inbox, by subscribing to The Tiger Take.
More information
- Panthers have never drafted a Clemson athlete. Here are the Tigers they could have taken.
- 'An invitation to judicial chaos': ACC, Clemson argue over jurisdiction in NC court
Jon Blau
Jon Blau has covered Clemson athletics for The Post and Courier since 2021. A native of South Jersey, he grew up on Rocky marathons and hoagies. To get the latest Clemson sports news, straight to your inbox, subscribe to his newsletter, The Tiger Take.
- Author twitter
- Author email
Similar Stories
Clemson's Swinney, Citadel's Drayton on tap for Coaches for Charity event
Clemson's Dabo Swinney and The Citadel's Maurice Drayton are among the football coaches lined up for the 15th annual South Carolina Coaches for Charity event. Read moreClemson's Swinney, Citadel's Drayton on tap for Coaches for Charity event
Is ESPN's definition of 'game' a trade secret? Clemson objects to redactions in ACC suit.
Pages in Clemson's complaint against the ACC are redacted due to "trade secrets" in the ESPN deal. The university's lawyers want those paragraphs to be public. Read moreIs ESPN's definition of 'game' a trade secret? Clemson objects to redactions in ACC suit.
Recruiting: Clemson, USC targets set to announce soon
Clemson targeting a wide receiver, while South Carolina has its eyes on a safety and a defensive tackle. Read moreRecruiting: Clemson, USC targets set to announce soon
Why an attempt to move Clemson-South Carolina to Black Friday made it into a legal filing
Yes, it was revealed this week that the ACC tried to move the Clemson-South Carolina game to a Friday night. But why did that detail show up in a court filing? Read moreWhy an attempt to move Clemson-South Carolina to Black Friday made it into a legal filing
Editor's Picks
Editor's Pick
4 types of popular hydrangeas for your Charleston garden
Top Story Editor's Pick
Oceans are getting hotter, and environmentalists are sounding the alarm for Charleston
Top Story Editor's Pick
What's the mysterious origin of South Carolina's 'red dot' stores?
Top Story Editor's Pick
DHEC no longer exists. With 2 new state agencies, how are South Carolinians impacted?
, Post and Courier, an Evening Post Publishing Newspaper Group. All rights reserved. | Terms of Sale | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy